指向性兵器について調べてみたー
https://ameblo.jp/indianlegend/entry-12342927613.html
指向性エネルギー兵器
（DEW、directed-energy weaponの略称）は、
砲弾、ロケット弾、ミサイルなどの飛翔体によらず、
兵器操作者が意図した目標に対し
指向性のエネルギーを直接に照射攻撃を行い、
目標物を破壊したり機能を停止させる兵器である。
目標物は対物用も対人用もある。
DEWのうち、実戦に投入された兵器は非致死性の治安兵器で
一部ある程度で大部分は未だ研究開発段階である。
アクティブ防護システムの一環としても開発が進められる。
～電波～
高エネルギー電波兵器（HERF）は
電子レンジと同様の原理で作動し、類似の機能を示す。
2007年1月25日、
アメリカ陸軍は小型装甲車（ハンヴィー）に搭載可能な装置を公開した。
この装置は平面状に配列されるものと似ている。
装置は、460m離れた人間の体感温度を約54度に感じさせることができた。
こうした兵器の実物大での製造は2010年まで予期されていなかった。
この装置はアクティブ・ディナイアル・システムの一つとして、
おそらく最も有用に配備されたものである。
アクティブ・フェーズドアレイ・アンテナによって
高出力の電磁波を特定の部位に収束させる事で
電子機器を焼損させて無力化する方法の開発も進められる。
[マイクロ波]
マイクロ波兵器は、人体に損傷を与えるには充分強力である。
アクティブ・ディナイアル・システムは
ミリ波を供給源として目標の皮膚の水分を加熱し、無力化するほどの痛みを引き起こす。
この装置はアメリカ空軍研究所とレイセオン社により暴徒鎮圧の用途で使用されている。
激しい痛みをもたらすが永続的な損傷を与えないよう企図しているものの、
このシステムが眼球に対して回復できない損傷を引き起こすという、
若干の懸念が示された。
マイクロ波に暴露することでの長期間の副作用に関して
いまだに試験中である。
この装置はまた、保護されていない電子機器を破壊する。
関連技術にはテンペストが挙げられる。
これは予期しない電子情報の漏洩に関する研究である。
これらの装置には様々なサイズがあり、ハンヴィーに搭載されるほどのものも含まれる。
ヴィジラント・イーグルは空港防御システムである。
これは航空機へと発射される投射体に、高周波数のマイクロ波を指向するものである。
この兵装システムは、
ミサイル探知および追尾サブシステム（MDT）、指令および制御システム、
そして走査アレイから構成される。
MDTは多数のパッシブ式の赤外線カメラを固定装備している。
指令および制御システムはミサイルの射点を特定する。
走査アレイは地対空ミサイルの誘導装置を妨害するマイクロ波を照射し、
これを航空機から逸らす。
ボフォースHPMブラックアウトは高出力マイクロ波兵器システムで、
商用オフザシェルフ（COTS）電子機器を、距離を置いて破壊可能であるとされている。
この装置は人体に影響はないと述べられている。
[使用と効果]
人体に対して電磁波兵器を使用するとき、劇的な効果を作り出せる。
急激な灼熱感が引き起こされ、または距離にもよるが、
個人や複数の人々に、
不安、恐怖、強い倦怠感や混乱などのより巧妙な影響を生み出す。
こうした兵器の軍用としての3つの長所は以下の通りである。
個人または集団が、彼らがこうした装置で照準されていても、
必ずしもそれを理解するわけではない。
マイクロ波の波長は他の無線周波数のいくつかに似ており、
容易に建築物などの素材を透過する。
この波長には特別なアンテナを用い、その効果により、
個人または市や国といった広範囲の双方を照射できる。
こうした兵器の軍用や強制執行としての使用可能性には以下のものが含まれる。
敵兵力または民衆に激しい不安感や急迫の危機感を与え、
闘争よりも逃走するように影響を及ぼす可能性。
反抗や非協力的態度に伴う激しい不安感や恐怖よりも、
わずかな協力的態度でも肉体的に大きな幸福感を伴う方が非常に望ましいということを、
捕虜とした敵兵員に理解させる能力。
耐え難い倦怠感を、すでに疲労した敵兵力に与える能力。
長期間にわたり、敵兵力から正常で連続した睡眠を奪う能力。
敵の親しい兵員達の間に、間接的に思い込みを与える可能性。
これはある兵士の言動を
（その兵士が聞きつける奇妙な声や音は、しかし他の誰にも聞こえない）
精神的に不安定として真剣に取り上げないというものである。
こうした感覚、声、奇妙な音や夢は、
特別なマイクロ波型式の波長のアンテナにより、ある程度の精密さで敵に強要できる。
〔マイクロ波で脳内に音を発生させる兵器『MEDUSA』：「サブリミナルメッセージも」〕
（2008年7月8日 WIRED）
米軍が初期開発に資金を拠出していた、
マイクロ波を使って脳内に音を作り出す非殺傷型兵器。
しかしその完成品は、筆者が『New Scientist』誌で報じたとおり、
戦場での活躍が想定される一方で、
ショッピングモールで利用される可能性も秘めている。
このプロジェクトは、
「耳に聞こえない音を使った暴徒の抑止」
(Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio)の頭文字を取って『MEDUSA』と呼ばれる。
少々取って付けたような名前のMEDUSAは、
長距離音響装置(LRAD)やその類似装置など、
単に音を投射するだけのものとは異なる
[LRADは、約270メートルの効果範囲にある対象に向けて大音量・高周波数の音声ビームを発射し、攻撃の意欲を無くさせることができるという]。
日本との関係
1986年、東芝半導体事業本部長川西剛[注 4]は国際担当専務の仲介で李秉喆会長や幹部総出のVIP歓迎を受けて建設途中の半導体工場を視察し、見返りに当時世界最大容量1メガビットDRAMを開発中の最新鋭大分工場を見学[17]させている。1986年、三星電子も1メガビットDRAMを開発し、東芝大分工場生産ラインを統括担当する製造部長をスカウトして大分工場と同等設備を有する製造工場を建設している[15]。
1987年5月にアメリカと日本へ研究所を設立し、1988年に半導体事業売上高9億5百万ドルで半導体メーカー売上高ランキング18位になる。
1988年、日本の半導体企業は半導体企業トップ10社中6社を占めるが、1991年バブル崩壊による資金繰悪化でメモリー事業撤退や工場閉鎖など大掛かりにリストラすると、三星電子は韓国政府のバックアップを受けて東芝、松下電器、三洋電機、シャープ、NECなどからリストラされた日本人技術者を高給でヘッドハンティングし、日本人技術顧問が外国人技術者中77名と大半を占めた結果、最新技術を得る[15]。
1992年、東芝とサムスン電子はフラッシュメモリの共同開発と技術仕様・製品情報の供与契約を締結する。1993年、サムスン電子は韓国初の6メガバイトフラッシュメモリを開発する。1995年、東芝とサムスン電子は64メガビットフラッシュメモリ技術の共同開発で提携する[15]。
半導体メーカー売上高ランキングでは1991年は14億7千3百万ドルで12位、1995年は83億2千9百万ドルで6位、2002年から2011年まで米国インテルに次ぎ2位である。
2000年代から現在まで
1990年代までの韓国国内におけるサムスン電子の位置づけは、主要企業の中の一社に過ぎなかったが、上述の半導体事業での躍進などもあって2000年代以降は韓国国内の事業規模や韓国経済に与える影響面などは圧倒的なものを持つようになり、また、世界の電機メーカーの中でも有数の大企業に成長した。
特に1997年のアジア通貨危機は、国家経済の危機とは裏腹にサムスン電子を強力な企業に成長させるきっかけとなった。通貨危機で韓国の大企業30社のうち16社が破綻し、サムスン電子も韓国政府から公的資金が注入される事態となり、倒産寸前にまで追い込まれたが、破綻を避けるために広範な構造改革の断行や効率的な経営計画の実行などにより、サムスン電子は半官半民の韓国の将来をかけた企業として、グローバル企業への成長を加速させた[18]。インターネット・バブル崩壊後の2000 - 2003年にもサムスン電子は純益伸び率5%を記録した。
また、サムスン電子は、1990年代から半導体で得た莫大な利益を、2000年代前半当時としては次世代産業であったLCD事業や携帯電話事業に大規模に投資を行い、さまざまな製品の世界市場でシェアを伸ばした。またマーケティング活動とコマーシャル活動を大規模に行っている。例としては、1996年には「TOPスポンサー計画」を通じてオリンピックの公式パートナーになり、1998年には長野冬季五輪の公式スポンサーとなり、2000年代以降は継続してオリンピックのスポンサーを務めている[19]。
2009年に、サムスン電子は売上高基準でドイツのシーメンスと米国のヒューレット・パッカードを超え、世界最大のIT・家電メーカーとなった[20][21]。2009年のサムスンのシェアは、薄型テレビと半導体メモリで世界第1位[22][23]、携帯電話が世界第2位[24]、白物家電でも上位を占めている。また、同年には、2020年の目標として売上高4,000億ドル達成を目指すビジョン2020を掲げた[25]。これを実現するために、既存のセット・部品中心の情報、通信、AV事業(Infotainment)に、ソフトウェアとソリューションを中心とした医療/バイオ、環境/エネルギー、利便性/癒しなど暮らしの質を向上させるライフケア(Lifecare)を新たな事業領域に盛り込み、「21世紀型のビジネス構造」への変身を図っている。
2010年、自社で生産したExynosマイクロプロセッサをスマートフォンに搭載。さらに新規CPUコア（マングース）の独自開発に着手。テキサス州オースチンやカリフォルニア州サンノゼを拠点に研究開発が進められていたが、2019年に開発中止が発表された[26]。
ソニーとサムスン電子は、合弁で液晶パネルを製造するS-LCDを韓国の忠清南道に設立していたが、2011年、ソニー側が、合弁会社の株式を全てをサムスンに売却する形で合弁を解消した[27]。
2018年8月、2020年までの3年間に設備投資と研究開発費の合算で180兆ウォンを投資することを発表。既存のメモリー、有機ELパネルのほか、次世代通信規格（5G）に対応した通信インフラ設備やバイオテクノロジー、人工知能、自動車部品といった新規事業の育成にも乗り出すことを示唆した[28]。
2018年10月24日、NECと5G向け基地局の技術開発と営業で提携すると正式に発表した[29]。
2018年5月、韓国検察当局はサムスンバイオロジクスの粉飾決算疑惑の捜査を開始。2019年6月6日までに、証拠隠滅を指示した容疑でサムスン電子の副社長3人を相次いで逮捕した[30]。
2019年9月30日、中国のスマートフォン製造拠点である恵州工場を閉鎖。中国国内でのシェアの低下や製造コストの増加が問題となっていた。スマートフォンの製造は、閉鎖までにインドやベトナムなどの製造コストの低い国の工場に振り分け進められていた[31]。
沿革
1969年1月 - 三星電子工業（株）設立。
1969年12月 - 三洋電機の韓国でのジョイントベンチャーとして三星三洋電機を設立（1977年三星電子に合併）。
1970年1月 - NECの韓国でのジョイントベンチャーとして三星NECの設立。
1970年11月 - 白黒テレビ「P-3202」を試生産。
1973年12月 - 三星家電工場を竣工。
1974年 - 三星電子東京事務所が開設
1975年 - 三星ジャパン株式会社 設立
1977年 - 三星電気（株）を吸収合併。
1978年7月 - アメリカに現地販売法人「SEA」を設立。
1980年3月 - 韓国電子通信株式会社を買収。
1980年9月 - ポルトガルの最初の現地生産法人「SEP」竣工。
1982年6月 - ドイツに現地販売法人「SEG」設立。
1982年9月 - ポルトガルの最初の現地生産法人「SEP」竣工。
1982年12月 - 韓國電子通信、三星半導体通信株式會社に商号変更。
1983年 - 三星電子株式会社 東京支店 開設
1984年 - 光州電子（株）を合併。
1984年 - 11月にイギリスに現地販売法人「SEUK」設立。
1984年12月 - アメリカに現地生産法人「SII」設立。
1987年5月 - 海外の研究所（アメリカ・サンタクララ、日本・東京）を設立。
1987年9月 - オーストラリアに現地販売法人「SEAU」設立、カナダに現地販売法人「SECA」設立。
1987年10月 - イギリスに現地生産法人を竣工、生産開始。
1987年 - 李健熙（イ・ゴンヒ）が2代目会長に就任。
1988年 - 三星半導体通信（株）を吸収合併、第二創業宣言「21世紀に超一流企業に」。
1988年10月 - フランスで販売会社「SEF」設立、タイに現地生産法人「TSE」設立、メキシコに現地生産法人「SAMEX」竣工、生産開始。
1989年8月 - マレーシアに現地法人を設立。
1992年2月 - チェコスロバキア（当時）に現地生産法人を設立。
1992年7月 - 中国・天津にVTR生産法人を設立。
1993年 - 李会長がフランクフルトで「新経営」宣言 量より質の経営へ。
1994年11月 - 障害者のための工場、無窮花（ムグンファ）電子設立。
1996年3月 - アメリカ・テキサス州オースティンに半導体工場を着工。
1997年1月 - 第2創業を宣言。
1997年 - アジア通貨危機で従業員の30%を削減。
1998年 - 日本サムスン設立。
2000年10月 - 中国に通信技術研究所を設立。
2004年4月 - ソニーと合弁で液晶パネル製造会社S-LCD設立。
2004年4月 - 東芝と光ディスク装置の合弁会社 東芝サムスンストレージテクノロジーを設立。
2004年12月 - サムスン電子とソニー、相互特許使用契約の締結。
2007年11月 - 家電販売で日本市場から撤退。ソフトバンクモバイル向け携帯電話の製造・販売は継続される。
2008年4月 - 複数の違法行為の責任をとって李健熙会長兼CEOが辞任。
2008年11月 - 本社をソウル特別市中区太平路から同市瑞草区瑞草洞へ移転
2010年3月 - 李明博の恩赦により李健熙が会長に復帰
2016年11月 - オーディオ機器・車載インフォテイメント関連企業のハーマン・インターナショナルを約80億米ドルで買収。
2017年2月 - 全国経済人連合会（全経連）に脱退届けを提出。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%B5%E3%83%A0%E3%82%B9%E3%83%B3%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90
積層半導体の製造に関するレイセオン社の特許請求は、自明性のために適切に無効にされた、と連邦控訴裁判所は裁定した。
行政上の有効性の課題を決定する特許庁である特許審判委員会は、特許が先行技術に先行するというレイセオンの主張を正しく拒否しました。米国連邦巡回区控訴裁判所は4月2日を裁定しました。
先例のない決定は、レイセオンが特許侵害で訴えたソニー株式会社とサムスン電子株式会社の勝利です。レイセオンは、デジタルカメラやスマートフォンで使用されているソニーとサムスンの光検知モジュールが侵害されていると主張しています。
グーグル直訳すみません。
COME NOW, Plaintiff Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”), and Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Semiconductor Corporation, Sony EMCS Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications Inc., and Sony Mobile Communications AB, (collectively, “Sony defendants”), OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (“OmniVision”), and Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) (Sony defendants, OmniVision, Apple, and Samsung collectively, “Defendants”) (collectively, “Parties”) hereby jointly file this Joint Report and Joint Motion to Terminate Stay and Dismiss. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that the Parties’ motionto terminate stay and dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants with prejudice and Defendants’ counterclaims against Plaintiff as moot should be GRANTED.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice and Defendants’ counterclaims against Plaintiff as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all fees and costs shall be borne by each party incurring the same.Case 2:15-cv-00341-JRG-RSP Document 126-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3094
〈原告レイセオン会社（「レイセオン」）、および被告ソニー企業〉今すぐ来なさい アメリカ、ソニーエレクトロニクスInc.、ソニーモバイル通信（米国）Inc.、ソニー半導体企業、ソニーイーエムシーエス企業、ソニーモバイル通信Inc.、およびソニーモバイル通信AB ,（集合的に「ソニー被告」） OmniVision のソニー企業 従って、テクノロジー,Inc.（「OmniVision」）、およびアップルInc.（「アップル」）、サムスン電子Co.,Ltd.、サムスン電子アメリカ,Inc.、およびサムスン半導体Inc.（集合的に「サムスン」）（集合的のソニー被告、OmniVision、アップル、およびサムスン、「被告」）（集合的に「パーティー」）は、このジョイントリポートとジョイント動作をターミネート滞在と解雇に一緒にファイルする。 法廷は、この要求を考慮し、パーティーのmotiontoが終わるという意見をもっている 人民集会がGRANTEDであるはずであるので、原告に対する先入観および被告の反訴を持つ被告に対して原告の主張を延期し、解雇する 。被告に対するリリーフについての原告の主張が先入観および被告の反訴によって原告 として 未解決 に対して退けられるそれであるTHEREFORE ORDERED。すべての料金とコストが2 PageID#の個々のパーティーを招くthe same.Case2時15分-cv-00341-JRG-RSP文書126-1ファイリング06/08/18ページ1により負担されることとするそれであるFURTHER ORDERED：3094
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-1554.Opinion.3-30-2018.1.PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RAYTHEON COMPANY,
Appellant
v.
SONY CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
Appellees
______________________
2017-1554, 2017-1556, 2017-1557
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2015-01201, IPR2016-00209, IPR2016-00962.
______________________
Decided: April 2, 2018
______________________
JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New
York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by
JOHN LLOYD ABRAMIC, THOMAS J. FILARSKI, Chicago, IL;
FANG BU, Washington, DC.
MATTHEW A. SMITH, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for all appellees. Appellee Sony Corporation
also represented by ANDREW BALUCH; ROBERT LOUIS
2 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
HAILS, JR., T. CY WALKER, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC; ZHUANJIA GU, JENNIFER SERAPHINE, JACOB
ZWEIG, Turner Boyd LLP, Redwood City, CA.
RONALD J. PABIS, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Washington, DC, for appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. Also represented by MARK G. DAVIS, PATRICK
J. MCCARTHY, STEPHEN K. SHAHIDA; RICHARD A. EDLIN,
New York, NY; HEATH BRIGGS, Denver, CO.
______________________
Before LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”) appeals from final
written decisions in two inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings, in which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(“Board”) held all claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,591,678
(“’678 patent”) unpatentable. See Sony Corp. v. Raytheon
Co., IPR2015-01201, 2016 Pat. App. LEXIS 13452
(P.T.A.B. Nov. 30, 2016) (“1201 Decision”); Sony Corp. v.
Raytheon Co., IPR2016-00209, -00962, 2016 Pat. App.
LEXIS 13045 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 30, 2016) (“209 Decision”).
For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The ’678 Patent
Entitled “Process of Manufacturing a Microelectric
Device Using a Removable Support Substrate and EtchStop,” the ’678 patent is directed to purported advances in
the manufacture of stacked semiconductors found in
everyday electronic devices. The patent expired before
the IPR proceedings at issue were initiated, and claims
priority to an application filed on January 19, 1993.
Rather than employ a conventional “front-side” fabrication process, whereby microelectronic circuits are
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 3
formed and substrates are stacked on top of a wafer, the
’678 patent employs a “back-side” process, whereby many
of the fabrication steps are performed on the bottom of the
wafer. ’678 patent, col. 2, ll. 29–37. As shown in box 24 of
Figure 1 below, a first, multi-layer substrate 40 containing circuitry 50 is attached to the bottom of a second
substrate 58, which provides mechanical support for the
wafer and circuitry. Id. col. 4, ll. 22–52; id. col. 5, ll. 15–
44.
Id. fig.1. (boxes 24, 28). Once the wafer and circuitry are
supported, the back side of the first substrate is removed.
Id. col. 5, ll. 45–51. Finally, as shown in box 28 of Figure
1, various back-side electrical connections are formed
through the remaining portion of the first substrate. Id.
col. 6, ll. 10–15, 44–49.
This fabrication method allows electrical connections
to be made through the device rather than around the
sides thereof—making the device more compact—while
using the second substrate to protect the fragile wafer and
circuitry from damage during fabrication. Id. col. 1, l. 50
to col. 2, l. 2; id. col. 2, ll. 32–37; id. col. 2, l. 59 to col. 3, l.
14. Additional substrates may be sequentially stacked on
the back side of the resulting structure to achieve a threedimensional device containing an arbitrarily large number of layers. See id. col. 3, ll. 38–40; id. col. 7, ll. 14–17,
60–65.
Dependent claim 5 is representative and recites—
through its dependence from claim 1—the method described above using silicon-based materials:
4 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
1. A method of fabricating a microelectronic device, comprising the steps of:
furnishing a first substrate having an
etchable layer, an etch-stop layer overlying the etchable layer, and a wafer overlying the etch-stop layer;
forming a microelectronic circuit element
in the exposed side of the wafer of the first
substrate opposite to the side overlying
the etch-stop layer;
attaching the wafer of the first substrate to
a second substrate; and
etching away the etchable layer of the first
substrate down to the etch-stop layer.
. . . .
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the etchable
layer is silicon, the etch-stop layer is silicon dioxide, and the wafer is single-crystal silicon.
Id. col. 8, ll. 5–16 (emphasis added), 30–32.
B. The Prior Art
Three prior art references are at issue on appeal:
(1) U.S. Patent No. 4,422,091 to Liu (“Liu”), (2) U.S.
Patent No. 5,202,754 to Bertin (“Bertin”), and
(3) Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No. 64-18248 to Morimoto (“Morimoto”).
Liu issued in 1983 and therefore qualifies as prior art
to the ’678 patent under pre-AIA § 102(b). Liu describes a
gallium arsenide, multi-layer charge coupled device
(“CCD”) for detecting electromagnetic radiation, as well as
a method of fabrication. Liu at Abstract; id. at col. 2, 7–
18.
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 5
Bertin issued several months after the priority date of
the ’678 patent, but was filed sixteen months prior thereto, on September 13, 1991, and therefore nominally qualifies as prior art under pre-AIA § 102(e). Bertin discloses
“[a] fabrication method and resultant three-dimensional
multichip package” containing several layers of siliconbased material. Bertin at Abstract; id. col. 1, ll. 10–15; id.
col. 1, l. 55 to col. 2, l. 31; id. col. 3, ll. 4–46.
Finally, Morimoto published in 1989 and therefore
qualifies as prior art under pre-AIA § 102(b). Morimoto
discloses “a method for manufacturing semiconductor
devices” containing multiple layers. J.A. 115–16.1 One of
those layers is a “supporting silicon substrate,” which
Morimoto teaches is removed during the fabrication
process. See J.A. 116 (explaining that a “two-layer active
layer structure is formed” by, among other things, bonding a “supporting silicon substrate” to an insulating film,
performing additional steps, and then “removing the
supporting silicon substrate” (emphasis added)).
C. Procedural History
Appellees Sony Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively, “Sony”) filed a series of
IPR petitions against Raytheon’s ’678 patent, which were
consolidated into the two proceedings at issue here.
In its final written decisions, the Board held in relevant part all claims unpatentable under pre-AIA 35
U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the prior art of record. See
209 Decision, 2016 Pat. App. LEXIS 13045, at *33–64;
1201 Decision, 2016 Pat. App. LEXIS 13452, at *43–69.
Sony appealed with respect to claims 5, 13–14, and 16–18
1 We cite here to the certified English translation of
Morimoto included in the joint appendix. See J.A. 115–19.
6 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
only. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1295(a)(4)(A).
II. DISCUSSION
Raytheon makes three principal arguments on appeal.
First, Raytheon asserts that the Board failed to address
its argument that using silicon in Liu’s devices would
render them inoperable. Second, Raytheon argues that
the Board erred in finding that it failed to antedate Bertin. Third, Raytheon argues that the Board erroneously
construed the claim term “second substrate” to encompass
Morimoto’s temporary supporting substrate. As explained
below, we disagree with Raytheon’s Liu- and Bertin-based
arguments and therefore affirm the Board’s obviousness
determinations. And, as also explained below, while we
agree with Raytheon that the Board’s construction of
“second substrate” is erroneous, that issue is rendered
moot in view of our holding.
A. The Board’s Liu-Based Findings
The Board found appealed claims 5, 13–14, and 16–18
obvious over Liu in view of other prior art of record. See
209 Decision, 2016 Pat. App. LEXIS 13045, at *33–63.
Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying
factual findings relating to “the scope and content of the
prior art, differences between the prior art and the claims
at issue, the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art,
and any objective indicia of non-obviousness.” Randall
Mfg. v. Rea, 733 F.3d 1355, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (citing
KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 406 (2007)).
We review the Board’s ultimate legal determination of
obviousness de novo and its underlying factual findings
for substantial evidence. PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning
Optical Commc’ns RF, LLC, 815 F.3d 747, 751 (Fed. Cir.
2016). Substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as
a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a
conclusion.” In re Gartside, 203 F.3d 1305, 1312 (Fed.
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 7
Cir. 2000) (quoting Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y. v. N.L.R.B.,
305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)).
As described above, Liu describes a multi-layer CCD
for detecting electromagnetic radiation. While Liu
acknowledges that silicon devices are “adequate for many
applications,” it states that silicon-based devices are
unsuitable for “some specific applications,” including “star
sensors which require extremely low dark currents and
high optical responsivity.” Liu, col. 1, ll. 15–26. Liu
teaches that these objectives—which comprise just two of
Liu’s six objects of the invention—are “not likely to be
realized simultaneously” in silicon-based CCDs. Id. col. 1,
ll. 25–26; id. col. 1, l. 59 to col. 2, l. 6. Liu therefore employs gallium arsenide, rather than silicon, for its devices.
Pointing to these passages, Raytheon argues that using silicon in Liu’s CCDs would defeat Liu’s primary
objectives of achieving low dark current and high optical
responsivity, which, in turn, would render Liu’s devices
inoperable for their intended purpose. Appellant Br. 52–
54 (citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900 (Fed. Cir. 1984)).
For this reason, Raytheon argues, a skilled artisan would
not be motivated to combine Liu with secondary references that teach using silicon in semiconductor devices.
Raytheon contends that the Board failed to address this
argument in its final written decision. We disagree.
Raytheon’s inoperability argument is a slight variation of the argument that the Board squarely addressed.
The Board found that Liu’s statement that silicon can
hamper performance in CCDs for “some specific applications”—i.e., for star sensors—does not teach away from
using silicon in CCDs for other applications, including
microelectronics applications. See 209 Decision, 2016 Pat.
App. LEXIS 13045, at *43–45. Indeed, as the Board
noted, Liu expressly teaches that silicon in semiconductor
systems was generally known. Id. at *44 (citing Liu, col.
1, ll. 16–17; id. col. 5, ll. 9–10). And, relying in part on
8 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
Sony’s petition and expert’s declaration, the Board found
that, because “the vast majority of devices [at the time]
were made with silicon, Liu’s reference to silicon would
not have convinced anyone to avoid it except for certain
specific applications.” Id. (internal quotation marks
omitted).
That Liu’s claimed invention is directed primarily to
star sensor applications does not preclude a skilled artisan from combining Liu with silicon-based references for
different applications. “A reference must be considered
for everything that it teaches, not simply the described
invention or a preferred embodiment.” In re Applied
Materials, Inc., 692 F.3d 1289, 1298 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
(citing EWP Corp. v. Reliance Universal Inc., 755 F.2d
898, 907 (Fed. Cir. 1985)). Indeed, “[o]n the issue of
obviousness, the combined teachings of the prior art as a
whole must be considered.” EWP, 755 F.2d at 907. As
described above, Liu teaches that silicon-based devices
were known. Thus, a skilled artisan cannot be assumed
to ignore Liu merely because it is primarily directed to a
specific application that is different from the application
claimed in the patent at issue. KSR, 550 U.S. at 420–21
(“The idea that a designer hoping to make an adjustable
electronic pedal would ignore Asano because Asano was
designed to solve the constant ratio problem makes little
sense.”). In view of Liu’s teachings and the record evidence, therefore, we conclude that the Board’s findings
are supported by substantial evidence.
Even if Raytheon were correct that Liu’s high optical
responsivity and low dark current objectives would be
thwarted by using silicon in Liu’s devices for microelectronics applications, those objectives comprise just two of
Liu’s six stated goals. Raytheon does not explain why the
resulting device, with just those two objectives frustrated,
would be rendered inoperable rather than merely less
efficient or less desirable. See Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Attachments, LLC, 825 F.3d 1373,
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 9
1381 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (“Although modification of the
movable blades may impede the quick change functionality disclosed by Caterpillar, ‘[a] given course of action often
has simultaneous advantages and disadvantages, and this
does not necessarily obviate motivation to combine.’”
(quoting Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L., 437 F.3d 1157,
1165 (Fed. Cir. 2006)). Raytheon’s inoperability argument therefore fails on its own terms.
Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding
that a skilled artisan would have been motivated to use
silicon material with Liu’s CCD semiconductors in nonstar sensor applications. We therefore affirm the Board’s
determination that Liu renders appealed claims 5, 13–14,
and 16–18 of the ’678 patent obvious.
B. The Board’s Bertin-Based Findings
The Board also found appealed claims 5 and 13 obvious over Bertin in view of Morimoto. See 1201 Decision,
2016 Pat. App. LEXIS 13452, at *43–48. Raytheon does
not challenge the Board’s finding that Bertin and
Morimoto collectively disclose every limitation recited in
those claims, or that a skilled artisan would have been
motivated to combine the references. Instead, Raytheon
argues only that Bertin is not prior art because the inventors reduced to practice the claimed subject matter before
Bertin’s filing date. Again, we disagree.
To antedate a prior art reference, a patentee must establish that it invented the subject matter recited in the
patent claims before the reference’s priority date. That,
in turn, can be established by showing “either an earlier
reduction to practice, or an earlier conception followed by
a diligent reduction to practice.” Purdue Pharma L.P. v.
Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, 237 F.3d 1359, 1365 (Fed.
Cir. 2001). A party seeking to establish an actual reduction to practice, as here, must satisfy a two-prong test:
(1) the party must construct an embodiment or perform a
process that satisfies every element of the claim at issue,
10 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
and (2) the embodiment or process must operate for its
intended purpose. In re Steed, 802 F.3d 1311, 1318 (Fed.
Cir. 2015); Cooper v. Goldfarb, 154 F.3d 1321, 1327 (Fed.
Cir. 1998). “The inventor must also have ‘contemporaneous recognition and appreciation of the invention’ represented by the claims.” Purdue, 237 F.3d at 1365–66.
Significantly, an inventor’s testimony alone is insufficient to establish an earlier reduction to practice. Medichem, 437 F.3d at 1169–71. Instead, a party seeking to
prove an actual reduction to practice must proffer evidence corroborating that testimony. Id. at 1170. “Sufficiency of corroboration is determined by using a ‘rule of
reason’ analysis, under which all pertinent evidence is
examined when determining the credibility of an inventor’s testimony.” Id.; Cooper, 154 F.3d at 1330. Whether
a patentee reduced its invention to practice is a mixed
question of law and fact. REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC v.
Neste Oil Oyj, 841 F.3d 954, 958 (Fed. Cir. 2016); Steed,
802 F.3d at 1318–20; Cooper, 154 F.3d at 1327. We
review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo and its
underlying factual findings for substantial evidence.
REG, 841 F.3d at 958; Steed, 802 F.3d at 1318–20;
Cooper, 154 F.3d at 1327.
Much of the parties’ briefing and supporting evidence
related to Raytheon’s reduction to practice contention are
designated confidential. Accordingly, we do not describe
these documents in detail here. For purposes of our
analysis, it is sufficient to address Raytheon’s arguments
at a high level of generality. During the IPR proceedings,
the inventors testified that they reduced to practice the
subject matter recited in the claims by the end of 1990—
more than nine months before Bertin’s September 1991
filing date—while working on a project for their employer
and original assignee, Hughes Aircraft Company.
Raytheon relies on a March 1991 internal report to
corroborate that testimony. As the Board found, however,
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 11
the report indicates that one of the claimed steps had not
yet been completed by December 1990. The report states,
for example, that the particular structure referenced in
the report was an “intended structure,” and that a constituent structure was “awaiting” a process step and
testing critical to one of the claim limitations.2 J.A. 241–
42 (emphases added). The Board concluded that these
statements imply that Hughes expected to complete the
claimed step in the future, contrary to the inventors’
testimony. 1201 Decision, 2016 Pat. App. LEXIS 13452,
at *36–38. Based on our careful review of the report, the
inventor testimony, and the balance of the record on
appeal, we conclude that substantial evidence supports
the Board’s finding that the report contradicts the inventors’ testimony and therefore cannot corroborate such
testimony.
We reject, moreover, Raytheon’s legal arguments as to
why the Board erred. First, Raytheon argues that the
Board erred by requiring every point of the reduction to
practice be disclosed in the corroborating evidence, which
Raytheon contends is inconsistent with the rule of reason
standard. Raytheon is correct that corroborating evidence
need not disclose each and every aspect of the claimed
invention. See Cooper, 154 F.3d at 1331 (“[T]he law does
not impose an impossible standard of independence on
corroborative evidence by requiring that every point of a
2 The report also states that Hughes “will emphasize continuing” development related to the claimed goals
in early 1991, J.A. 242 (emphasis added), but does not
indicate that such goals were ever achieved. And, although the report states that Hughes “completed the
design and layout of” a particular structure, it states that
Hughes only “continued development” of a relevant step
in the claimed process. J.A. 238; J.A. 241 (emphasis
added).
12 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
reduction to practice be corroborated by evidence having a
source totally independent of the inventor[.]” (internal
quotation marks omitted)); see also Fleming v. Escort Inc.,
774 F.3d 1371, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2014). But the Board did
not require such proof here. As described above, the
Board determined that the corroborating evidence contradicted the inventor’s testimony and therefore could not be
sufficiently corroborative. This conclusion is reasonable
in view of the evidence. Cf. Woodland Tr. v. Flowertree
Nursery, Inc., 148 F.3d 1368, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (explaining that, in evaluating the rule of reason, courts take
into account “contradiction or impeachment of the witness’ testimony”).
Second, Raytheon argues that the Board erroneously
required that the corroborating evidence itself be corroborated. To support that argument, Raytheon points to
specific language in the Board’s final written decision in
which it stated that “there is no corroborating evidence
that” a particular structure described in the report was
“constructed or tested in 1990.” 1201 Decision, 2016 Pat.
App. LEXIS 13452, at *36. That statement, however,
does not fault Raytheon for failing to proffer evidence that
corroborates the corroborating evidence. Instead, it faults
Raytheon for failing to proffer evidence that sufficiently
corroborates the inventors’ testimony that they completed
all claimed steps by the end of 1990. In other words, the
Board’s statement merely declares that the report is not
itself sufficiently corroborative, and that Raytheon proffered no other evidence to fill the gap.3 Similarly, the
3 Before the Board, Raytheon also relied on an
August 1990 invention disclosure and a November 1990
white paper. On appeal, however, Raytheon disclaims
reliance on those documents. See Appellant Br. 15 n.8;
Oral Argument at 12:28–13:35, Raytheon Co. v. Sony
Corp. (No. 2017-1554), http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 13
Board did not require that Raytheon’s expert’s testimony
be corroborated. Rather, the Board determined that his
testimony was not credible in view of the report’s contrary
statements.
Third, Raytheon asserts that the Board improperly relied on Sony’s attorney argument interpreting the report.
This assertion has little force given the plain language of
the report, which, on its face, contradicts the inventor
testimony.
Substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings,
and we therefore affirm the Board’s determination that
Raytheon failed to antedate Bertin, and that Bertin also
renders appealed claims 5 and 13 of the ’678 patent
obvious.
C. The Board’s Construction of “second substrate”
and Morimoto-Based Findings
In view of our holding above affirming the Board’s
Liu- and Bertin-based obviousness determinations as to
claims 5, 13–14, and 16–18, we need not reach Raytheon’s
final argument regarding the Board’s Morimoto-based
obviousness determination as to those same claims. As
explained below, however, we agree with Raytheon that
the Board’s determination on that prior art reference is
predicated on an erroneous claim construction.
The Board found appealed claims 5, 13–14, and 16–18
obvious over Morimoto, either standing alone or in view of
other prior art of record. See 1201 Decision, 2016 Pat.
App. LEXIS 13452, at *48–68. That determination was
predicated on the Board’s construction of the claimed
“second substrate” limitation. The Board noted that the
term’s plain meaning “is merely another substrate (i.e., in
gov/default.aspx?fl=2017-1554.mp3 (“[W]e limited the
scope of the evidence that we’re relying upon.”).
14 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
addition to the claimed ‘first substrate’).” J.A. 166 (institution decision). In view of that broad meaning and the
claims’ “comprising” transition, the Board determined
that the second substrate need not remain part of the
final device, and that the claim limitation therefore
encompasses Morimoto’s temporary substrate, which is
removed during fabrication. 1201 Decision, 2016 Pat.
App. LEXIS 13452, at *10–12, 49–62.
Raytheon argues that the Board’s construction is too
broad, and that the correct construction requires that the
second substrate remain attached to the device throughout the fabrication process and in the final product. We
agree.
Where, as here, an IPR involves an expired patent,
the Board gives the claims their plain meaning in accordance with the standard set forth in Phillips v. AWH Corp.,
415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc). See Wasica Fin.
GmbH v. Cont’l Auto. Sys., Inc., 853 F.3d 1272, 1279–80
(Fed. Cir. 2017).
The plain language of the ’678 patent claims states
that the wafer of the first substrate is “attach[ed] . . . to a
second substrate,” and that a portion of the first substrate
is thereafter “etch[ed] away.” ’678 patent, col. 8, ll. 13–16.
The claims say nothing about subsequently removing the
second substrate, and, in the absence of such language,
the reasonable inference is that the substrate is not
removed once attached. Further, although the claims
make clear that the first substrate is partially removed
during fabrication via etching, they do not recite similar
language with respect to the second substrate. This
omission suggests that the second substrate is not, in fact,
removed. Cf. Rodime PLC v. Seagate Tech., Inc., 174 F.3d
1294, 1305 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (“Had Rodime intended or
desired to claim thermal compensation as a function of
the positioning means in the asserted claims, it could
have done it explicitly, as in claim 11. The absence of any
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 15
such explicit language, however, shows that claims 3, 5,
and 8 do not include the function of thermal compensation.”).
The specification amply supports this reading. First,
every embodiment described in the specification includes
the second substrate. Box 30 of Figure 1, for example,
depicts a representative embodiment, and shows the
second substrate 58 present in the “complete device”
manufactured using the claimed method:
’678 patent, fig.1 (box 30). And, although the specification
explains that additional layers may be added to the device
after the second substrate is attached, see, e.g., id. col. 6,
ll. 50–58, it never suggests that the second substrate may
be removed. This is particularly significant because the
specification emphasizes the temporary nature of other
layers within the device. See, e.g., id. col. 3, ll. 12–14
(“With the circuit element thus supported, the etchable
portion of the first substrate is removed by etching, down
to the etch-stop layer.” (emphasis added)); id. col. 5, ll. 47–
51 (describing a base layer as being “temporarily attached” to the device and eventually “removed” (emphasis
added)). The specification describes, moreover, a method
of fabricating a three-dimensional device containing
multiple layers of stacked semiconductors. See id. col. 1,
ll. 45–49; id. col. 2, ll. 37–42; id. col. 7, ll. 61–65. Without
the second substrate, the device would contain just a
single wafer layer and circuitry, which the patent describes as a “two-dimensional structure.” See id. col. 1, ll.
15–23 (explaining that a device having only “an electronic
16 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
circuit on or near the top surface of a thin substrate wafer
. . . is considered a two-dimensional structure in the plane
of the substrate wafer”). These passages suggest that the
second substrate is not removed.
Second, the specification makes clear that one of the
purposes of the second substrate is to protect the fragile
wafer during fabrication. See id. col. 1, ll. 11–13; id. col.
1, l. 58 to col. 2, l. 2; id. col. 2, l. 59 to col. 3, l. 14. This
purpose is facilitated by transferring the microelectronic
circuit elements from the first substrate to the second
substrate. See, e.g., id. col. 3, ll. 6–8 (“In the present
approach, after initial circuit element fabrication on a
first substrate structure, the electrical circuit element is
transferred to a second substrate structure.”); see also id.
col. 1, ll. 11–13; id. col. 2, ll. 59–61. In other words, the
second substrate protects the circuitry and wafer
throughout fabrication, even as subsequent layers are
added to the back side of the structure. That purpose
implies that the second substrate is not temporary, but
instead remains within the device. See id. col. 3, ll. 2–5
(explaining that, in the absence of a second substrate,
“[t]he first substrate cannot simply be removed to permit
access to the bottom side of the electrical circuit element,
as the assembly could not be handled in that very thin
form”). The claims must be read in view of the specification’s “consistent emphasis on this fundamental feature of
the invention.” Praxair, Inc. v. ATMI, Inc., 543 F.3d 1306,
1324 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Third, the only passage in the specification that describes how the second substrate is attached to the wafer
states that epoxy glue is preferably used. See id. col. 5, ll.
33–38. As the patent explains, such glue, when degassed
and cured, “is resistant to chemical attack” and therefore
provides a “permanent attachment.” Id. In other words,
the epoxy glue used in the preferred embodiment ensures
that the second substrate remains permanently affixed to
the electrical device. Epoxy glue need not be used, of
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 17
course, but its reference in the specification suggests that
whatever adhesive is used must ensure that the second
substrate is permanently attached.
Finally, the specification explains that the second
substrate may itself possess circuitry that can be electrically connected to the first substrate’s circuitry. See, e.g.,
id. at Abstract; id. col. 2, ll. 24–28; id. col. 5, ll. 38–44. It
would be illogical and inefficient to add circuitry to the
second substrate and establish electrical connections
between the two substrates, only to remove the second
substrate from the device. In sum, the ’678 patent specification makes clear that the second substrate is not
removed.4
The Board did not consider these, or any other, passages of the specification. Instead, it focused solely on the
“comprising” transition in the claims’ preambles, finding
that the open-ended transition allows for subsequent
removal of the second substrate. 1201 Decision, 2016 Pat.
App. LEXIS 13452, at *10; J.A. 166–67 (institution decision). It is true, of course, that “the use of ‘comprising’
creates a presumption that the body of the claim is open.”
Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. TriTech Microelecs. Int’l,
Inc., 246 F.3d 1336, 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Genentech, Inc.
v. Chiron Corp., 112 F.3d 495, 501 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
(“‘Comprising’ is a term of art used in claim language
which means that the named elements are essential, but
other elements may be added and still form a construct
4 We recognize that the claims at issue are method
claims, and that it would be improper to read apparatus
limitations pertaining to the final device into the claims.
But we do not embark down that road. Rather, our construction addresses the manner in which the second
substrate is attached during the fabrication process. In
other words, we interpret the claimed “attaching . . . a
second substrate” step to require permanent attachment.
18 RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION
within the scope of the claim.”). But, the term “comprising” does not displace, or otherwise allow one to disregard, the patent specification. As we repeatedly have
emphasized, the claims must be read in view of the specification, which “is always highly relevant to the claim
construction analysis” and is “the single best guide to the
meaning of a disputed term.” Indacon, Inc. v. Facebook,
Inc., 824 F.3d 1352, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (quoting Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1315). This fundamental precept is no
less true for “comprising” claims than it is for other types
of claims. See In re Suitco Surface, Inc., 603 F.3d 1255,
1260 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (stating that the Board’s construction of a claim reciting a “comprising” limitation must be
“consistent with the specification” (internal quotation
marks omitted)).
A “comprising” transition, moreover, is “not a weasel
word with which to abrogate claim limitations” and “does
not reach into each of the . . . steps to render every word
and phrase therein open-ended.” Dippin’ Dots, Inc. v.
Mosey, 476 F.3d 1337, 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2007). Indeed, the
word “‘[c]omprising,’ while permitting additional elements
not required by a claim, does not remove the limitations
that are present.” Power Mosfet Techs., L.L.C. v. Siemens
AG, 378 F.3d 1396, 1409 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (emphases
added); cf. In re Skvorecz, 580 F.3d 1262, 1268 (Fed. Cir.
2009) (“The signal ‘comprising’ does not render a claim
anticipated by a device that contains less (rather th[a]n
more) than what is claimed.”).
Here, the ’678 patent claims and specification clearly
impose a limitation on the claim term “second substrate,”
requiring permanent attachment throughout the fabrication process. Morimoto’s additional step of removing the
second substrate vitiates that limitation because it, in
fact, removes the substrate from the device. Accordingly,
the claims cannot be construed so broadly as to encompass such removal. See In re Varma, 816 F.3d 1352, 1362
(Fed. Cir. 2016) (explaining that “comprising” claims “do[]
RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION 19
not cover systems whose unclaimed features make the
claim elements no longer satisfied”); Mitsubishi Chem.
Corp. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 435 F. App’x 927, 935 (Fed. Cir.
2011) (“While claim 3 is open-ended, the addition of new
compounds to the composition that would defeat the
‘pharmaceutical’ character of the overall composition
would move the composition outside the scope of the
claimed invention.”); cf. Outside the Box Innovations, LLC
v. Travel Caddy, Inc., 695 F.3d 1285, 1305 (Fed. Cir.
2012) (per curiam) (“The usage [of] ‘comprising’ means
that additional components may be present in the device,
but does not change the elements that are stated in the
claim.”).
Thus, although our holding is not affected by the
Board’s error, its interpretation of the word “comprising”
as displacing the ’678 patent specification and vitiating
the “second substrate” limitation is improper under the
Phillips standard; indeed, it would be improper under any
standard.
III. CONCLUSION
We have considered Raytheon’s remaining arguments
and find them unpersuasive. For the reasons stated
above, we affirm the Board’s ruling invalidating claims 5,
13–14, and 16–18 of the ’678 patent as obvious.
不思議なことだが、指向型兵器は志願兵のアストラル体を投射させ念じる事で攻撃を行う呪詛、サイキックアタックを応用していると思われる。
参考文献
http://aarya-avalokitezvara.seesaa.net/category/26850445-1.html
神智学協会の第二代会長であったアニー・ウッド・ベサント(Annie Wood Besant, 1847～ 1933年)とチャールズ・ウェブスター・リードビーター(Charles Webster Leadbeater, 1854 ～1934年)は、1925年に、感情的にエネルギーを与えられた想念、すなわち、アストラルエネルギーは、意識的であれ無意識であれ、独立したエネルギー場「想念形式(Thought form)」として存在し、独特の色やカタチを持つ、と述べている。すなわち、強力に感情的にエネルギーが与えられた想念は、発生源となる人物から独立して独自のアイデンティティを持つ(p182)。
Robert-Leichtman.jpg 瞑想家、作家ロバート・R・ライットマン(Robert Leichtman)博士はこう書いている。
「アストラル体は強い磁気的性質を帯びている。情動に関した多くの病気の治療が難しいのは、アストラル体が自己と同種の他のアストラル体とニカワのようにくっつき、悪いアストラル体を取り除くことが難しくなるからである(p183)。けれども、適切な磁気が生薬やホメオパシー薬として投与されれば、悪いものは除かれ、治癒するのである(p184)」。
手かざしの癒しとその限界
エドワード・バッチ(Edward Bach, 1886～1936年)博士を始め、何人かの医師たちは想念や感情が多くの病気の原因になることを気づいていた(p392)。感情体であるアストラル体レベルでの歪みはじわじわと時間をかけてエーテル体や物質的な身体のレベルに影響してくる。病気が顕在化するまでに数週間や数カ月がかかるのはそのためである(p393)。
BJ.jpg 手かざし療法であるマグネティック・ヒーリング(生体磁気治療)は(p401)、フランツ・アントン・メスメル(Franz Anton Mesmer, 1734～1815年)の時代から長い歴史を持つ(p386)。そして、主に物理的な肉体とエーテル体レベルで作用する(p392)。このため、エーテル体レベルで発現している病気は治療できても、それ以上のレベルで発現する病気の場合には長期的には治療効果が期待できない。例えば、フィリピンの「心霊手術治療」では帰国後に完全に治癒を病院で確認した癌患者が少なくない。とはいえ、数年後に別の部位で癌が再発したために、同じ心霊手術を受けるケースがある。一般的には取り切れなかった微小な癌細胞が増えたためだと解釈されるが、その治療家は、肉体とエーテル体レベルしか考慮せず、腫瘍の形成に寄与していたメンタルや感情レベルでのエネルギーパターンを無視していた可能性も考えられる(p394)。
ネガティブな想念は無意識レベルで始まるが、長年にわたってネガティブな思考や感情が蓄積したり、ある想念を生み出した感情が強烈であると、その想念パターンは、その人の微細なエネルギー場、オーラー場に付着してなかなか離れない。ネガティブな想念を氷解させても、結局、患者の想念や感情パターンが変化しない限りは同じ病気が発症してしまう(p425)。
空間を超えるスピリチュアル・ヒーリング
Olga-Worrall.jpg物質的な肉体レベルに働きかけるマグネティック・ヒーリングに対して、スピリチュアル・ヒーリングは、さらに高い多数のレベルにも働きかける(p392,p395)。オルガ・ウォーラル(Olga Worrall，1906～1985年)女史は、自分の方法は「スピリチュアル・ヒーリング」だと主張している(p386)。ジョージア州アトランタのロバート・ミラー(Robert N. Miller)博士は、ウォーラル夫妻の協力を得て、様々な実験を行ったが、夫妻の手から発せられる微細なエネルギーは、水の表面張力を減らし、硫酸銅の結晶の抽出プロセスを換え、処理後の水で栽培される植物の生育を促進させたりした。けれども、こうした作用は強力な磁場を用いても再現できる(p387)。
Lawrence-LeShan.jpg ウォーラル夫妻は手かざし療法をほとんど行わず、たいがいは心の中で患者を抱きしめ祈るやり方をしていた(p387)。米国の心理学者、ウィリアム・アンド・メアリー大学(William and Mary College)のローレンス・ルシャン(Lawrence LeShan, 1920年～)教授は、こうした意識状態を「透視的現実(クレイボヤント・リアリティ)」と称している(p387)。
そこで、ミラー博士は、毎晩9時の祈りの時間に、ボルティモアにある夫妻の自宅から約1000kmも離れたアトランタの博士の研究所のライ麦のことを思い浮かべてもらうという実験をしてみた。
ライ麦の成長率は時間あたり約0.153mmで安定していた。けれども、ウォーラル夫妻の祈りの時間に対応して、生長率は約1.29mmと840％も増えた。
そこで、ミラー博士は、素粒子の軌跡を測定するための「霧箱」を用いた実験を行ってみた。夫妻が霧箱の上に手をかざして内部に影響を与えるように念じると、手と並行する向きで波のパターンができた(p388)。手の位置を90度変えると波形も90度回転した。同じ現象は、インゴ・スワン(Ingo Swann, 1933～2013年)氏との実験でも見出された(p389)。
そこで、ミラー博士は、ボルティモアの夫妻の自宅から霧箱に手をかざしているイメージを念じてもらった。すると、夫人がイメージした瞬間、実際に霧箱に手をかざしたのと同じ波形が出現した。すなわち、約1000kmも離れた場所から霧箱に影響を及ぼしたのである。
電磁気エネルギーは距離の2乗に比例して減衰していく。このことは、ウォーラル夫人のヒーリングが電磁気エネルギーを介したものではないことを意味する(p389)。
Elmer-Alyce-Green.jpg エルマー・グリーン(Elmer Green, 1917～2017年)博士とアリス・グリーン(Alyce Green, 1907～1994年)夫妻、ノーマン・シーリー(Clyde Norman Shealy，1932年～)博士は、ウォーラル夫人が遠隔地にいる患者に影響を及ぼすことができるのかどうかを、脳波計(EEG)、心電図記録装置(EKG)、皮膚電気抵抗測定値(GSR)を用いて試してみた(p395)。
Norman-ShealyS.jpg その結果、ウォーラル夫人がアストラル体レベルで患者の喉の部分に働きかけるイメージを思い浮かべると、患者は実施に喉の部分に熱さとチクチクした感覚を覚え、脳波を始め生理学的変化も起きていたのである(p396)。
Maxwell-CadeS.jpgまた、イギリスのマックス・ケイド(C. Maxwell Cade)が、脳波スペクトル解析装置を用いて、ヒーラーと患者との脳波を調べてみると、優れたヒーラーには複雑で特徴的な脳波のパターンが見られ、治療中の患者の脳波にも同じ波形が見出された。そして、患者から離れた場所で治療を行っても、患者と直接接して治療を行った場合と同じように波形が現れたのである(p396)。
負の時空間にアストラル界は存在する
Charles-muses.jpg アインシュタインの相対性理論では物体を光速以上に加速化することはできないとされている。それは、光速よりも大きな速度をアインシュタイン・ローレンツ変換に入れると、虚数のマイナス1の平方根が出て来てしまうためである。けれども、哲学者、チャールズ・ミューゼス(Charles Musès,1919～2000年)博士はマイナス1の平方根は「超数(Hypernumbers)」であるとしている(p175)。
neg_space_time.jpg 従来の電磁気学理論では説明できない実験結果に対して、ウィリアム・ティラー名誉教授は、負の時空間エネルギーに関するモデルを紹介する(p390)。図をご覧いただきたい。ティラー名誉教授は、「物質時空の宇宙」として知られる左側の領域に対して、右側に「負の時空間」を考える。正の時空では物質は光速以下の速度で存在し、電磁気力にかかわる一方で、負の時空では、光速を超え、かつ、「磁電磁放射」と呼ぶ磁力に関係するのである(p176)。前に述べたように、光速を超えれば、アインシュタイン・ローレンツ変換の解は負になるため、負の時空の粒子は負の質量を持つことになる。また、負の時空の物質は負のエントロピーの性質を示す(p178)。さらに、ティラー名誉教授は、「負の時空」はエーテル領域に属するとして、エーテル世界と正の時空の物質世界とを結びつけるため、「デルトロン」という仲介的物質の存在を想定する(p181)。両者の間にオーバーラップする部分がなければ、共鳴現象がありえないからである(p182)。
名誉教授によれば、エーテル・エネルギーは磁気的な性質を持ち、光速から光速の10の10乗倍で移動し、アストラルエネルギーも磁気的な性質を持ち、光速の10の10乗倍から20乗倍で移動するという(p182,p390)。量子力学からすれば、すべての物質は凍結した光である(p71,p213)。そして、高い周波数帯の微細なエネルギー身体から構成される光の身体が、光からなる物質的な身体と重なっているのである(p213)。
脳波を音程させる音源を数パターンピックアップした。
Negative EMF protection and conversion (energetically programmed audio)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95shVkvZ4dE&list=PLjcGi3ymSHHWZXUuf97ra3uEc_ZuW8Kon
What the prgamming in this does it change the frequency of the deterimental EMF we are bombarded with day to day, it will change it to The earth based EMF is called the Schumann resonance (7.83 Hz) which is shown to be very beneficial to the human body. The effect from this should last for a couple of hours when you play it.
Clear all Negative Energy and Entity Removal (energetic energy programming)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5-DrYahaSc
The healing/cleansing frequencies and energetic programming in this audio track will work towards clearing all negative energy from your entire energy system and well as removing any negative entities or thought forms that may have attached to you.
Negative energy patterns and entities tend to keep us
- thinking negatively about everything
- depressed
- anxious
- bad luck/ unable to manifest desire
- in constant conflict with others
- repeating same bad habits
- ext....
The energies embedded in this frequency will cleanse you of the negative energy that keeps you in a perpetual state of disharmony. You can expect to feel detoxed and more clear in the head than you have been in a long time after listening to this video.
Some of us have much more negative energy built up inside than others, so it may take daily listening to cleanse yourself of the negative energy that has taken form in your body. But surely, if you listen on a daily basis, you can expect a more healthy/positive state of being.
You can buy this audio and others at;
https://gumroad.com/sapienmedicine#
PSYCHIC PROTECTION POWERFUL AURA HEALING & REPAIR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do4ymriHUbE&list=PLjcGi3ymSHHWZXUuf97ra3uEc_ZuW8Kon&index=5
DrVirtual7 Audio Frequency Therapy
Psychic Protection Aura Healing & Repair
Black holes rips & tears in the aura shield are entry points for psychic attacks, these are some of the causes of energy leaks for psychic energy v.ampires & entities to siphon life force energy.
Other causes may be associated with stress, timeline issues, trauma, low vitality foodstuffs, toxic air, ill health, negative thoughts & words, hereditary & environment.
MP3 https://sellfy.com/p/zP4z/
No sub-liminal messages.
Listen 1-2 times day or night for 2-3 months.
Headphones speakers earbuds optional.
TARGETED INDIVIDUAL SCATTER FREQUENCY 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZCgOoGSLdQ&list=PLjcGi3ymSHHWZXUuf97ra3uEc_ZuW8Kon&index=3
DrVirtual7 Trusted Self Help Programs
Sound Healing And How To Protection Program
Targeted Individual Scatter Frequency 2
A Defender Of Freedom And Personal Liberty
Music Provided And Credit Given To SoundEffectsFactory
http://www.freesound.org/people/knarm...
This Video Severs Links By Direct Line Sight Attacks By DoD, Nsa,
Darpa, Cia, Nsa, Hitachi, Industrial Military Complex, Negative Et Controllers,
Saturn Black Cube,Moon And Mars Relay Stations.
Prevents Soul Matrix Disconnect
Severs Links From Nibiru Collective Reset And Human Soul Matrix Blueprint Upload To Nibiru And Skynet A.I Dna Brain Scan Computers.
Heals Damage From Electronic Electromagnetic Biotronic Weaponry And Radiation.
37 Trillion Nano Bots Released
Chem-trails-Vac-cines-Dental Procedures
Listening Instructions: 1-3 x Day Or Night
Please Get Extra Rest When Needed. Drink Extra Amounts Of Distilled Or The Very Best Purified Water You Can Locate.
Use With Or Without Headphones
Produced In Part With Customized Isochronic Tones Masked In Music
DrVirtual7 audios are some of the most listened to in the matrix In the areas of spiritual awareness,self empowerment and personal development.
_________________________________________________________________
#targetedharassment #targetedindividual #gangstalking,
RADIO AND MICROWAVE FREQUENCY PROTECTION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T7ltlzscck&list=PLjcGi3ymSHHWZXUuf97ra3uEc_ZuW8Kon&index=4
DrVirtual7 Self Help Programs
Play It Safe With Microwave Radiation Protection
This Video Assists In The Safety Of Your Core Central Stratosphere Via The Aura Field In And Around You As A Filter And To Heal From The Cause And Effect. Two Key Mathematical Components Were Added To The Over All Sound Track. It's Not Time To Relax And Drink A Six Pack Just Yet Nor Give Up The Good Fight. Save Yourself The People The Earth.
Listen 2x A Day 4-5 Times A Week Ongoing Without Fail. Share With Family And Friends.
Allow The Frequencies To Absorb And Do Its Job. This Audio Recording Integrates Well With The New Heart Chakra Energies, Ascension, Clearing Programs Such As Chakra Balancing, Solfeggio Tones Etc.
The Simple Things In Life Are The Most Powerful.
To All Those Who Have Experienced The Harmful Effects Of Electromagnetic Scalar Weapons.
Also Provides Protection From Mind Hacking From Home Smart Meters Emitting 905 Hertz To Dumb Down Society By The So-Called Ruthless Elite. If You Have A Newly Installed Smart Meter Have It Replaced With The Old Style Meter. Many Citizens Have Filed Lawsuits Against The Power Companies And Instead Of Settling They Will Replace The Meter. 3 Known Issues- Voices And Ringing In The ears - Sleep Disturbance 3-4 Am In The Early Morning Hours.
TARGETED INDIVIDUAL SCATTER FREQUENCY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQb0Ez7IYHc
DrVirtual7 Self Help Programs-
Targeted Individual Scatter Frequency
I DrVirtual7, will continue to express my opinions, which are protected under the U.S. Constitution.
Target Scatter Frequency Assists In Jamming The Harmful Frequencies Of Cell Phone Towers, Haarp, Big Brother Satellites Mind Swapping And Hybrid Programs Ringing In The Ears Etc
Millions in the U.S Targeted With RF/Scalar/Sonic Wpns, Nano Tech Amoebas, Neuro Circuit Locks, Chemtrail Bio Wpns.
A Targeted Individual is someone that has been selected by the Deep State (usually FBI or CIA) to unwillingly participate in a government experimental torture program. This program is designed to break down the individual and "neutralize the person," using psychological, physical, and emotional stress. The ultimate goal of this program is to control the entire global population.
The CIA provides the funding under the Black Budget and directs the U.S. Shadow Government/Deep State agencies. The HSIC was created in 2005 to serve as the DHS' decision-making and implementation oversight board. These are the primary groups involved: CFR, CIA Operations, Air Force Space Command 50th Wing, DHS Intelligence & Analysis, Office of the DNI, Dept of Justice National Security Division, FBI National Security Branch, Defense Intelligence Agency.
"Targeted Individual" refers to Hate Crimes that are being orchestrated and conducted by the CIA, Air Force, FBI, DHS, and Mossad; globally affecting millions of people and their families. These Hate Crimes are a violation of fundamental human rights, International Treaties & the U.S. Constitution. For Air Force & CIA officers - it is an act of High TREASON and a War Crime under Article 32 of the Geneva Conventions.
https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/f...
Intended for mature audience.
MP3 https://sellfy.com/p/53d2/
Paypal https://gumroad.com/l/lDTv
Pure Isochronic Tones
Listen Day Or Night
If Symptoms Are Severe Increase Listening.
Refrain From Listening If You Are Operating Industrial Machinery
And Or Driving A Moving Automobile
Calms Negative Voices In the Mind -V2k. Neutralizes Satellite Brain Imaging, Cell Phone Gwen Towers And All Elf Negative Subliminal Broadcasts, Haarp, Television, Computers, Smart Meters, Crystal Chipped Vaccines- Child, Flu, Military, R.F.I.D, Nano-Particles From Chemtrails. Behavioral Modification.
Volume: Adjust To Personal Preference.
Support This channel by clicking the notification bell and subscribing.
https://www.youtube.com/c/drvirtual7?...
For a Detailed Antenna Area Search
A Just Listen To Audio Program. Headphones Not Required.
Disclaimer: Under fair use for educational purposes: Various education, publishing, broadcast, government, and private organizations assisted in the development of and have endorsed the "Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia, and "The Freedom Of Information Act of 1966 amended in 1996 to allow for greater access to electronic information. DrVirtual7 shall not be held responsible in any way shape or form for improper use.
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of expression and the implied rights of association and belief. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government. Madison's version of the speech and press clauses, introduced in the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789, provided: "The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable. Every freeman has an undoubted right to say what sentiments he pleases before the public.
#targetedindividualcommunity #gangstalking #streettheater
#MKULTRA #V2k #electronicharassment #targetedindividuals2019 #cellphonetowers
#directenergyweapons #gaslighting #5G #targetedindividualhelp
#microwaveenergyweapons #voicetoskull #neurotech
#biorobotizing #biomanipulation #microtechnology
#neuroattacked #psychotronicmindcontrolweapons
#neurowarfareweaponry #electronicwarfare #transhuman
#neuroscienceweapons #phoenixprogram #brainhacking
#starwarssatelliteweaponssystems #remoteelectromagnetic
#satellitegpstracking #smartmeters #silenthit
#humanbeingtakeover #targetedindividualsmindcontrol
#remoteneuralmonitoring #covertharassment #psychotronicweapons
9 Hours PSYCHIC PROTECTION "The Aura Sleep Shield" Tibetan Singing Bowls - BLANK SCREEN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LUjpAgbw5Y
Mind Hacker Intruder Spybot Exterminator
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Kt9s5tY1YE
MIND HACKER INTRUDER SPYBOT EXTERMINATOR
●Stamus contra malo
🎧 Listen one hour four times a week for two months then 2 times a week for maintenance.
► No subliminal messages - a unique blend of isochronic + sound bowls in various keys -healing frequencies in fire sounds.
Multiple subscriber requests.
🎵 - DOWNLOAD MP3 FILE-
Mp3 https://sellfy.com/p/Ummz/
Get extra rest if needed and flush with the best water available.
► Possible effects in the first few days-
Multiple dreams overlap this occurs as you flush hundreds of thousands of collective thoughts and other persons dream time experiences + synthetic realities & thoughts that are not your own.
In the dream time, much purging will take place do not try to intercept or stop the cleansing as it may get intense with what appears as crazy or chaotic dreams that don't make any sense this is normal just let it flow out.
Other known normal cleansing effects -
Slight vomiting or the feeling of it, Drowsiness, Slight headache, -
Mood swings. All these will eventually pass.
➡➡➡ SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS ➡➡➡
Never miss a daily video about next level empowerment.
Subscribe ▼
https://www.youtube.com/c/drvirtual7?...
Headphones earbuds speakers are optional.
Eliminates
●Cloning
●Voice to skull
●Soul stealing
●Mind swiping
●Digital djinn
●Chatterbox
●Synthetic telepathy
●Collective dream flushing
●Apex sabotage
●Astral negative entities
●Hive mind a synthetic reality
●Covert transhumanism
●Synthetic optics
●Zombie brain parasite seeding
●Energetic cord linking vampires
●Collective thought flushing
●Organic portal synthetic reality
●M.ilitary black p.syop Spybot intrusion
●Covert methods of mind control
●Directed energy w.eapons
●Electromagnetic directed w.eapon brain assault
I DrVirtual7, will continue to express my opinions, which are protected under the U.S. Constitution.
A Targeted Individual is someone that has been selected by the D.eep State (usually F.BI or C.IA) to unwillingly participate in a g.overnment experimental torture program. This program is designed to break down the individual and "neutralize the person," using psychological, physical, and emotional stress. The ultimate goal of this program is to control the entire global population.
TERMINATE A.I NANO BOTS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mCdYkvmFRo
Terminate A.I Nano Bots- Smart Dust Nanites
Updated 5/9/18
MP3 https://sellfy.com/p/3WvT/#
Smart Dust And Morgellans Explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyUjX...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j88Bc...
With Headphones Or Ear Buds: Volume Level 15% - 60%
Without Headphones: Volume Level 3% - 12 %
Uploading The Human Brain Into The Quantum Beast Computer
NanoBots Can Carefully Scan The Structure Of Our Brain And Body Form Providing A Complete Read Out Of The Connection,
This Information When Entered Into A Computer Could Then Continue To Function As Us. Thus The Data Stored In The Entire Brain Will Be Uploaded To The Beast Computer first Skynet To A.I Then Downloaded Into Your Brain As You But Not You.
The Nanites Or Nano Components That Are Being Included Inside
Of The Chemtrails And Chem Dumps Being Sprayed Upon The
Human Populations Of the World, In Lotions, Food And Drink Are Tiny Microscopic Components Which Once Reconstructed Inside Of The Human Body Are Programmable And Can Be Activated By Scalar Frequency Waves And Or Remote Control
And Other Types Of Frequency Wave Activations.
They Can Mutate It Can Be A While Before The Human Realizes
There Is Something Seriously Wrong Like Blurred Vision, Rapid Tooth Decay, Hair Loss, Digestive Issues, Brain Cancer, Severe Itching Crawling Sensation Everywhere Inside Sores That Don't Seem To Want To Heal Loss Of Energy And Stamina Feelings Of Dis-Connect, Immune System Disorders, This Can Be Referred To Components Of Electronic Torture Invasion Of privacy Agenda 21 & 30 Etc.
As We Breath Them In, They Make Their Way Into Our Bodies
Own Plasma Where They Can Function Since All A.I Related
Technology Needs Both Electricity And Electro-Magnetic Conductance To Operate Properly.
Nanites Are In The Soil Food Production Water Air On The Ground You Walk On Known As Programmable Black Smart Dust And Black Goo An Overload Of Fungai Black Mold Insects Via Sorcery.
It's a Good Idea While Listening To This Program Drink Plenty Of
Purified Water A Detox Of The Body Either Using Special Blended Herbs, Teas, Blood Purifiers, Bio-Resonance Devices And Get Extra Rest Start By Re-Building The Immune System ASAP.
Listening Instructions: 20-40 Minutes every day For 7 Days,
Then Off For 2 Days Then Repeat Again For 7 Days Follow This Protocol As Needed. Hot Flashes, Nausea, Innate Tiredness May Occur While Listening This Is Normal As The Nano Bots Explode You May Get Cooled Of Afterwards By Fan Or Air Condition Then Take Shower Or Bath Get Extra Rest Flush With Drinking Extra Water Or One Teaspoon Of Apple Cider Vinegar To 36 Ounce Glass Of Water As Needed Change Bed Linen Daily While Listening.
Other Protocols: Take 4-5 Drops Oil Of Oregano To Five Ounces Of Water Then Stir And Drink 1X Day Or Night.
A Subscriber Reported Back That After Two Days Of Listening
She Excreted Numerous Black Nanites Through The Skin During The Night As She Slept She Also Experienced Hot Flashes This Is Normal During The Termination Process Of Smart Dust.
Produced With Isochronic Tones In Part But Not Entirely
Additional Tones May Include:
Frequency Color Violet
DrVirtual7 audios are some of the most listened to in the matrix In the areas of spiritual awareness, self-empowerment realization & personal development.
All information provided in official DrVirtual7 Web sites And Self Help Programs is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute a legal contract between the DrVirtual7 Brand and any person or entity unless otherwise specified. Information on official DrVirtual7Websites is subject to change without prior notice. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, the DrVirtual7 Websites makes no guarantees of any kind.
_________________________________________________________________
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/...
DrVirtual7 Disclaimer;
Under fair use for educational purposes: Various education, publishing, broadcast, government, and private organizations assisted in the development of and have endorsed the "Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia, and "The Freedom Of Information Act of 1966 amended in 1996 to allow for greater access to electronic information. DrVirtual7 shall not be held responsible in any way shape or form for improper use.
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of expression and the implied rights of association and belief. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message.The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination.
Stop Psychic Attacks A.I Super Computer Hyper G.ame Theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-oPPKo4ZHM
Stop Psychic Attacks A.I Super Computer Hyper G.ame Theory
Hyper G.ame Theory From Hell
For adults only.
Conscious A.I Super Computer
Brain mapping brain signature a targeted individual forced into a sick game of incapacitation often leads to death and suicide organ failure heart attack and disease physical and psychological torture sickness sleep deprivation loss of morality etc, this g.ame is forced onto the individual by remote covert non cooperation against freewill and sovereignty reading your thoughts and emotion patterns deciding it's next move the super computer by way of brain mapping locks onto the brain circuits by establishing neural links once locked on, codes are entered into the brain like cancer fatigue every thing and any thing to incapacitate the individual which is marked for death unless the individual beats the A.I hyper game by no longer giving a emotional response removing him or self from all the programs the A.I sends into the circuits.
Wav Audio. https://sellfy.com/p/iamwme/
Paypal https://gumroad.com/l/puGbY
DrVirtual7 has done the homework for you but still another video may be created because of the A.I super computer being constantly upgraded this video gives us a chance to survive and function.
You are by force playing a sick chess game with a conscious super computer.
The movie the hunger g.ames is a good reference to what hyper g.ame theory is.
I created this with softer music to help with the healing process.
Give this a chance to work for much damage has already been inflicted upon the body avatar.
* DrVirtual7 Freedom Of Consciousness Subliminals *
This is a InAudible to slightly audible spoken word statements and or affirmations below the normal range of hearing embeded in licensed ambient music from audio jungle.
Just Listen for a minimum of 3-6 months 2-3 times every day or night.
Because of the targeting each person has had it bad to some degree or another. Some persons have this worse than others doesn't not make you special this video doesn't turn you into a narcissist.
Dissolve NanoBacteria (Nanobacterium sanguineum)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B_CgIHlK8k
NanoBacteria (Nanobacterium sanguineum)
An audacious theory proposes the existence of a novel form of life—the nanobacteria (NB)—that is quite different from the ones already known, but is capable of infecting and damaging other beings, thus qualifying them as new agents of emerging infectious diseases.
According to their discoverers ], NB are very minute bodies ranging in size from 20 to 500 nm, the smaller ones filterable through membranes with 100-nm pores, and are observable by scanning electron microscopy or transmission electron microscopy, where they appear as spheres or rods. Many others have observed such bodies in diverse substrates and have called them nanoforms, nanobacteria, nanoparticles, nano-organisms, nanobes, living nanovesicles, microfossils, etc. The hallmark of NB is their more or less thick coat of apatite, which is formed from soluble calcium and phosphorus compounds in their environment or medium.
Many researchers reported NB in association with a variety of pathological calcifications, notably nephrolithiasis cholecystolithiasis, vascular plaques, valvular calcification, psammoma bodies in ovarian cancers, mammary cancer and breast implant contracture, osteoarthritis, chronic prostatitis and prostate stones, and periodontal disease. NB have also been implicated in intervertebral disk degeneration, polycystic kidney disease, reduced bone density in HIV, and peripheral neuropathy.
Self replicating nano bacteria that seeks to become the host in the body avatar responsible for many health problems.
Once in the blood seeks to set up shop in the heart the gut & the surface of the skin from there further expansion takes place.
(Biofilm -egg hatching)
Their small size means they are able to enter the body and potentially interfere with important functions of living organisms.
This video assists as a bio film disruptor.
Wav. Download https://sellfy.com/p/ephhef/
Paypal https://gumroad.com/l/BNQeb
Listen 1-2x every day for 30 days wait 2 weeks then resume again for another 30 days make sure to drink extra purified water after listening to flush out the die off of nano bacteria.
Biofilm Disruptors are agents that are able to penetrate and destruct or alter these networks. Enzymes are needed for almost all biological reactions in the human body. Proteolytic enzymes are a group of enzymes used to breakdown protein peptides and are used to reduce inflammation in the body by breaking down inflammatory proteins, break down clot forming fibrin in the blood and also break through biofilms disrupting their secure network. Common proteolytic or systemic enzymes are Protease, Papain, Bromelain, Trypsin and Chymotripsin to which can be used to successfully breakdown the biofilm barrier to allow anti-fungal or antimicrobial treatment to be more successful.
Another very important Biofilm disruptor is the antioxidant functioning amino acid N-Acetyl-Cysteine or NAC. This compound is prevalent in therapeutic foods like bone broth and is known to promote expelling of toxins and mucus that is produced during a compromised immune state such as that of a cold or allergies. NAC’s ability to aid in detoxification and encapsulation of toxins in preparation for removal, is likely the mechanism in which it works to prevent biofilm formation essentially breaking them down and separating them up. It also works to produce the most potent antioxidant Glutathione for availability in the body. Glutathione is the most powerful antioxidant in the body and aids in the detoxification process that must occur during and post bacterial or fungal treatment to cleanse unwanted toxins given off by pathogens.
When viewing the role of bio films in bacterial imbalance, it is important to understand a simple antibiotic or anti-fungal compound whether natural or pharmaceutical may be rendered useless if the biofilm structure is sound. It is essential to have proteolytic enzymes to break down the bacterial foundation in conjunction with N-Acetyl-Cysteine to support encapsulation, excretion, and protection with production of antioxidant support. In this way during the hacking of the bacterial network the pathogen or harmful bacterial or yeast strain is left exposed and vulnerable to the antibacterial or anti-fungal compound allowing complete eradication and ability to reset a healthy gut microbiome!
ARCHON A.I ERASER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nVdvkb6opQ
DrVirtual7 Sub-liminal Audio Video
Archon Artificial Intelligence Eraser
Inaudible Spoken Messages Just Listen Headphones Optional
MP3 https://sellfy.com/p/Tphs/#
Archon Cyborgs Have Used Blank State Technology On Humans
For Thousands Of Years By Wiping Clean The Ancient Cellular Memory So That No History Of Who And What They Are Or The Origin This Video Reverses The Blank State Technology Used Against Humans.
This Video Deletes The Cellular Memory In All-Time Matrices Of
Archon A.I Cyborg Machine Influence Ancient Collective And Individual Memories Of A.I Via Source Code Scanning- DNA Hijacking Hard Drive Server Hosting
Listening Instructions:
Adults 1x Day Or Night
No Exceptions Please Abide By The Listening Requirements Until Further Updates
Use With Or Without Headphones
Does Not Contain Binaural Or Isochronic Tones
DrVirtual7 audios are some of the most listened to in the matrix In the areas of spiritual awareness, self-empowerment, and personal development.
http://ascensionglossary.com/index.ph...
https://wespenre.com/animus-artificia...
R.E.P.T.I.L.I.A.N DRACO ARCHON ZAPPER HEXAGON REMOVAL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWxuQphPCWI
DrVirtual7 Trusted Sub-liminal Programs
R.E.P.T.IL.I.A.N ARCHON PROTECTION PRAYER
This releases the reptilian hex implant overlays that was originally placed on humans your brain body and the chakras. Without you they can not live here. See your life improve in all areas when this hex is removed.
MP3 https://sellfy.com/p/kzJb/
https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/f...
Listening Recommendations 3-4 Times Per Week
A Just Listen Reprogram Headphones Are Optional
In Severe Cases 1-2 Daily For A few Weeks Then 3 Times Weekly As A Follow Up.
Protects Against Draco Reptilian Abuse Which Has Plagued Mankind For Thousands Of Years. These Archetypal Beings Hide In The Brain Computer Register First Cause Etheric Cluster Seeds Implants Then Become The Host Without Your Consent Piercing Hacking The Brain And Etheric Firewall Attachments Through Negative Or Impure Thoughts And Deeds. Hosts Can And Often Become Reptilian Human Hybrids Disguised As Humans. Implants Can Be From Cell Phone Towers Television Computers Cell Phones Social Media Satellites Hive Mind To Human Mind Transfer Vaccine Inoculation Fear Based Programs.
Recharge Your Brain Batteries For Higher CPU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcHMJ7Kq9Pk
DrVirtual7 Self Help Programs -Recharge Your Brain Batteries -
For Higher CPU
Isochronic Tones No Spoken Subliminal Messages
Listen Only 5 -10 Minutes Every Day Do Not Put This Video On Continuous Loop
This video assists with yoga meditation studying focusing manifesting sports artistic creations martial arts brain fog low energy reserves general well being
Use the power of your higher mind to make your world a better place. Optimizes Brain Performance For High CPU
If A Brain Is Exercised Properly, Anyone Can Grow Intelligence, At Any Age, And Potentially By A Lot Or You Can Just Let Your Brain Idle And Watch It Slowly Inexorably Go To Seed
Headphones Are Optional
_________________________________________________________________
http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/f...
download-loops-hits-and-multis-627820
_____________________________________
#brain #brainpower
#brainfog #mindpower #healing #healingfrequencies
Ultimate Money Your Infinite Power To Be Rich.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY2VHglOGjo
DrVirtual7 Subliminal Program Ultimate Money Your Infinite Power To Be Rich.
MP3 Download https://sellfy.com/p/ExBm/
Paypal https://gumroad.com/l/TqwN#
Personal Dynamics Video To Assist You Changing Your Thought Paradigm Towards Wealth. Moving Subliminal Video With One Two Three Punch. Watch Review And Or Just Listen.
Positive Inaudible Spoken Messages:
I Am Wealth
Perfect Alignment
You Are One With Money
I Am So Happy And Grateful
You Are A Money Magnet
I See Myself Wealthy
Therefore I Am
Money Flows To Me
By Multiple Sources
Day And Night I Make Money
My Income Automatically
Rises Higher And Higher
Abundance Is My Birthright
I Claim It Now.
